Bofferbrauer2 said:
I think they left the 16 core out for several reasons: 1. Not needed yet to counter Intel in some way, and previous gen Threadripper fills that niche nicely right now. 2. Limited volume of the 7nm Production at TSMC limits the amount of chips AMD can receive. Imagine AMD also running headlong into supply constrains just like Intel... 3. The Mainboards. It's probable that the early Mainboards were not totally to the task for more than 8 cores, so they take it slow to give the mainboard partners time to adapt their boards, drivers, and bioses. Yeah, Navi will get interesting. Hence why I'm eager to see that PC gaming show on E3, as they announced more information on Navi there. |
My biggest problem with the idea that AMD will launch a 16-core Ryzen product in the 3x00 family is that they've already used all the high numbers and, while not improbably (as they did it with Threadripper), it would be a bit stupid to make the flagship model the 3950X.
Had they left the 3900 name empty, I could see the possibility of such monster but, right now, I only see it if Intel somehow has a hidden gem that catches everybody with their guard low. And the 9900KS doesn't fit that role.
As for their GPU, I do also want to see how it performs in the real world. After all, Strange Brigade is a game that we know runs very well on AMD hardware, so that 10% advantage over the 2070 in that particular game doesn't tell us much.
Please excuse my bad English.
Former gaming PC: i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070
Current gaming PC: R5-7600, 32GB RAM 6000MT/s (CL30) and a RX 9060XT 16GB
Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.







