o_O.Q said:
"You didn't answer my question, why do you think that way?" i said i agreed with you that mothers should be able to murder their unborn children " There's no reason in a civilized society that multi-billionaires, whose profit comes at the expense of the people, should be treated better and be able to get huge tax cuts and breaks while the very same people that they profited off of die " so resources should be channeled from people who have more to people who have less the developing child in the womb needs resources from the mother to survive, why in this case where the person in question is much more vulnerable and in far more need do you renege on your position and go in the opposite direction? and the mothers also profit from society btw as every single person does "so far the wealthiest have just been taking" how do you think people become wealthy? |
Again, this is the second time you dodged my question. I didn't ask if you agreed with me of not because frankly I don't care if you do. I asked why do you think that way, why do you think mother's should be able to have abortions. And I'm going to add if you are pro-choice why make a thread that's obviously skewed and flawed from the start, anybody who has any simple concept of science would realize this and not even post such a flawed comparison.
I don't renege at all. You have a fundamentally flawed understanding of conception and what is a group of cells or an actual child and you conflate the latter two and think it's one and the same but it's not. A group of cells isn't life, it isn't a person. A miscarriage up to 8 weeks of pregnancy is indistinguishable to a heavy period. Even our natural body knows that it isn't life. The "person" you think is a person isn't actually one according to scientific evidence and facts. You just feel it's a person but that doesn't make it one. You only think I'm reneging because you think a group of cells is a person and your factually wrong about that and so your argument is wrong and your comparison is wrong.
People become wealthy by the people, we give them extreme wealth so in return they should give a portion back to us so we all can have a better life. Their wealth isn't being taken away, just a portion would be redistributed to the population to help society. Keep in mind we're hypothetically talking about multi-billionaires here, that is an incredible amount of money for one individual or family, odds are losing even 10 million of their 2 billion won't effect them. They probably won't even notice because they're still making incredible amounts of money.
