By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
o_O.Q said:
sethnintendo said:
How about this hypocrisy? Repuplicans are anti welfare and anti abortion. Well you can't have it both ways... You'd think republicans would be in favor of abortion if it kept the poor off welfare.

"How about this hypocrisy? Repuplicans are anti welfare and anti abortion. Well you can't have it both ways..."

actually you can if you restrict the sexual freedoms of women

the amusing thing for me is that both groups are for restricting freedom, but the democrats pretend they are not and they also pretend to care about people as a fundamental value but are completely ok with the murder of unborn children

How are democrats restricting freedom?  Freedom of the unborn baby I assume.  There are so many damn humans on this earth I don't really think it matters if a few unwanted babies are terminated.  One can argue the reduction in crime rate that happened after Roe v Wade was mainly because you didn't have a bunch of neglected and unwanted babies turning to a life of crime.

I also have issue with one of the quotes in your op.  Someone somehow states "in fact, parasites and their hosts often enjoy mutually supportive relationships, "

That is news to me.  I could have sworn parasites harm the host and offer no benefit.  If there was benefit to both then it is labeled symbiotic relationship.  If it is so often that parasites and hosts mutually benefit then why the heck have I never heard of such a case.  You can't mix symbiotic relationship and parasite definitions.  They are two separate relationships.