By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
SpokenTruth said:
o_O.Q said:

"You must not be familiar with a UBI.  It's not intended to be a livable income.  You still need a job."

1). even though its been brought up in the context of people losing their jobs to automation?

"That said, isn't it more humane to reduce the chance the child will be born into a situation where it cannot be properly cared for?"

2). are you in favour of killing some poor people since they cannot be properly cared for? well no in that case you demand that other people(generally men) take their resources and give those resources to the poor people

but when it comes to kids you don't demand that resources be allocated for them in the same way, why is that?

you would argue i suppose that it restricts the mothers bodily autonomy, without realising of course that when resources are reallocated for poor people that's also infringing on the bodily autonomy of those people who resources are being taken from

"How is trying to ensure the well being of both the mother and child inconsistent? "

3). you are trying to ensure the well being of the child by crushing its skull and then sucking its body parts out of the womb through a tube? how thoughtful of you

1). Irrelevant how or why they are no longer working.  A UBI is not a living income.

2). I'm going to need you to respond to my previous question about how you define a 'kid' before I can adequately answer you here.  However, I want social services for the fetus but until we get that, women should have the right to terminate.

3). You just described Intrauterine Cranial Decompression which a 3rd trimester abortion technique and not legal in the US without a serious medical emergency. This is why pro-choice hate debating with pro-lifers...they latter rarely understand what they are protesting against.

Metroid33slayer said:

No financial penalties, no 18 years in baby jail.

Really?  For some states, convictions can be a sentence of up to five years in prison, a fine up to $125,000 or both.  So again, where are you getting your lies from?

"Irrelevant how or why they are no longer working."

its relevant when its being proposed as a substitute for wages when someone has lost a job

"I'm going to need you to respond to my previous question about how you define a 'kid'"

i was referring to unborn children

"women should have the right to terminate."

why don't women have a responsibility to their community to pass resources down to their kids as you expect richer people have a responsibility to give some of their resources to poorer people?

"Cranial Decompression which a 3rd trimester abortion technique"

a child has facial features in place at 13 weeks btw

"This is why pro-choice hate debating with pro-lifers"

never said i was prolife, i've said that i think women should have the right to kill their unborn children, but that doesn't mean i can't point out hypocrisy coming from the democrats on this issue