SpokenTruth said:
1). Irrelevant how or why they are no longer working. A UBI is not a living income. 2). I'm going to need you to respond to my previous question about how you define a 'kid' before I can adequately answer you here. However, I want social services for the fetus but until we get that, women should have the right to terminate. 3). You just described Intrauterine Cranial Decompression which a 3rd trimester abortion technique and not legal in the US without a serious medical emergency. This is why pro-choice hate debating with pro-lifers...they latter rarely understand what they are protesting against.
Really? For some states, convictions can be a sentence of up to five years in prison, a fine up to $125,000 or both. So again, where are you getting your lies from? |
"Irrelevant how or why they are no longer working."
its relevant when its being proposed as a substitute for wages when someone has lost a job
"I'm going to need you to respond to my previous question about how you define a 'kid'"
i was referring to unborn children
"women should have the right to terminate."
why don't women have a responsibility to their community to pass resources down to their kids as you expect richer people have a responsibility to give some of their resources to poorer people?
"Cranial Decompression which a 3rd trimester abortion technique"
a child has facial features in place at 13 weeks btw
"This is why pro-choice hate debating with pro-lifers"
never said i was prolife, i've said that i think women should have the right to kill their unborn children, but that doesn't mean i can't point out hypocrisy coming from the democrats on this issue