Your parallels have one major failure point. A UBI enables the lowest income earners in society to become contributing members of said society which in turn helps the whole society. An unplanned child cannot be a contributing member of society for nearly 2 decades. Worse still for a mother who may already be struggling and now has to struggle even harder.
Are you including the paternal figure here too?
"Your parallels have one major failure point. A UBI enables the lowest income earners in society to become contributing members of said society"
that's not true
for many people if their basic needs are provided for they won't feel the need to provide value to society, since they'll be provided for regardless
what are you basing your argument on exactly?
"An unplanned child cannot be a contributing member of society for nearly 2 decades. "
and they may never become one, that's true... which isn't any different from ubi anyway
i'm just amused at the hypocrisy inherent in saying we need to be compassionate and take care of the downtrodden by taking from those that have more, but when it comes to kids, the argument is fuck those kids because they will be taking resources from the mothers who have more
and democrats can stand there and say this shit and not see that its inconsistent and even outright toxic since it could be argued that poor people occasionally make bad choices that result in their situation but the same can never be said of the unborn