rnrnrnrnrnrn
curl-6 said:
rnrnrnrnrnrnrn
linkink said:
rn
This is just speculation on your part. We don't how big the strides were in hardware utilization were this gen, it's safe to assume ps3 were probably much bigger because it of how complex it was, we can't say ps4 didn't have big strides in hardware utilization when results show it clearly has. Before ps4 came out no developer has ever tried to max out a Radeon HD 7850, with a a weak 8 core Jaguar CPU. Besides engine evolving, and new rendering techniques alone can be more impressive then better hardware utilization and rendering techniques combined, it just depends how advanced the former is.
rn
Wanna know how subjective people opinions are in progress here is a video comparison GEARS 1-3 on 360, and most think gears 1 looks the best.
rn
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SSR0wncErTw&t=134s
Honestly to me The progression in ps4 and ps4 look very similar, kind find ps4 to be more impressive.
|
It's neither speculation nor opinion that PS4 is based on mature standardized CPU/GPU tech and PS3 used exotic hardware that took developers years to master. Those are the concrete facts of this case.
|
Your speculation comes from you assuming big strides were not made on ps4 hardware utilization based on it being off the shelf parts which is nonsense. if you told most people that Radeon HD 7850 With 8 core Jaguar would be able to run RDR2, Horizon, GOW, and Battlefront they would have thought you were crazy. Even it's off the shelf parts developers still need years of experience to max out the hardware. It took nearly 6 years for some of the most talented developers to actually get games on par with 360 on ps3 , some developers were actually never able to.
Last edited by linkink - on 08 May 2019
