ironmanDX said:
I never argued a timed contract of 2 years. I argued 30 million. If MS orders 15, which is likely, Sony wouldn't order 30 because of reasons I've already stated though not directly responded too. Call my number arbitrary all you like. We know nothing about anything. Rumours are simply.... Rumours. This whole discussion is arbitrary. "Also why would the contract establish a specific design instead of quantities of the chip powering PS5 and revisions along the line?" Because signing off on a product that isn't even finished R&D yet is... Stupid. Even if they're involved in the process. No crystal balls are involved.
|
For what reason would the order from Sony not be about double of MS when they sell about double?
So since you know they won't change supplier they can have an agreement signed with volumes even if the specifics of the HW isn't defined and immutable.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







