By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
CGI-Quality said:
Nautilus said:

I can agree to that.

I just find foolish to think that: A) a place, or in this case the PC market, is going to remain static forever.Disruptions, big or small, will inevitably happen at some point.And as a consequence, the PC market will have its lows and highs.And B) that in the GAMING market, people care more about services than the actual games.They dont.Its like the same discussion we had a few months(years?) back about that if games went all digital, you would stop playing.Anyone that answered yes, never really liked games, or is so invested in the drama surrounding games in general, that gaming for them is like football: What they actually enjoy is seeing which team wins, not actually watching the match.Buying less games is something that might actually happen, but stopping altogether?In the case, the problem isnt the games being digital, but something else.

The disruption isn't the issue, though. Those are generally good and how the industry grew to begin with. What Epic is doing is something that side steps even traditions and that is what's got people going. The empty storefront just adds salt to the entire situation.

But what Epic is doing is a disruption.I mean, I agree that its not perfect, with the lack of services and all, but it is.

Im not bothered with people complaining about the lack of services.They have a point and heck, I agree with them.But saying that Epic is an evil company that wants to destroy the PC space?Please.



My (locked) thread about how difficulty should be a decision for the developers, not the gamers.

https://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=241866&page=1