Offical Sell-in numbers for PS3 - credit to ArmGunar.

[dharh]

JRPGfan said:

vivster said:
I'm sure they could've squeezed the Vita numbers in between the lines.

Honestly think Sony are ashamed of it...... it was over designed, and thus overpriced, with features that wherent really needed.
It didnt sell so well, so they arnt gonna list it next to things that are worth mentioning if they can avoid it.

That explains why they show the PSP but not the Vita.
Its nots a home console vs handheld thingy (cuz then why have the PSP shown?).
Its a "we re pretending the vita wasnt ever a thing" thing.

The irony is I liked the system... but its not hard for me to admit it was a flawed system.
It sony ever does a handheld again, I hope they dont make the same mistakes.

The PSP really was just better than the Vita for its time.  It even had a quasi Switch feature with the PSP Go that was kinda lame given that it was digital only.  PSP support for PS1 was better than the Vita ffs.  Still loved my Vita though, for Vita games, when I was still doing portable gaming.