By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
LuccaCardoso1 said:
DonFerrari said:

Considering what is on the 50 Metacritic is garbage material I would disagree whole heartily.

Reading IGN review that they gave a 6.5 seems like a 8-8.5 game that they took out points.

Stop trying to damage control. Play the game before saying what score it deserves.

Not doing any damage control. Will you deny that 50 on metacritic is reserved to garbage level game?

I didn't complain on the reasons IGN took out the points. Have you read the review?

Or better yet have you played the game to give your opinion since that is what you are demanding?

vivster said:
DonFerrari said:

Considering what is on the 50 Metacritic is garbage material I would disagree whole heartily.

Reading IGN review that they gave a 6.5 seems like a 8-8.5 game that they took out points.

5 is mediocre. It's not my fault that reviewers have decided that for some reason 7 is the middle of 10.

We have to do comparisons using the context. In the context that average/mediocre games are on the 7, then this game being mediocre would deserve a 7.

But seems like it got a 3/10 will you say that is also deserved?



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."