Otter said:
lol, I think people completely miss the mark in terms of sexualisation comparisons. Idealised =/=Sexualised. Emphasis on crotch shots... Military outfits centred on sideboobs lol...Compelely random outfits there to sell the anatomy
|
" Idealised =/=Sexualised."
in the context of physical makeup, they are the exact same thing
"sexualisation is not being cut out of games."
it is and honestly i wouldn't have a problem with that if the reason was logical and consistent
"His whole outfit is also functional, whereas the latter is literally about sexualisation."
men and women in terms of their dress often typically display this difference, in that men generally dress more practically whereas women dress to emphasize their sexual appeal more
this is why makeup, heels, low cut dresses etc etc etc exist but of course its not politically correct to point out these differences in how men and women present themselves
this is why its pretty idiotic for sjws to claim "WOMEN NEED TO BE DEPICTED THE SAME AS MEN IN GAMES OR ELSE BOYS WILL BE SOCIALISED TO THINK WOMEN ARE SEXUAL OBJECTS"... the obvious rebuttal is what are you going to do about the way real women present themselves? if this argument is actually valid (which its obviously not) why wouldn't the kim kardassians and ava roses of the world do the same?
"Emphasis on crotch shots... Military outfits centred on sideboobs lol...Compelely random outfits there to sell the anatomy"
its almost as bad as if they were shirtless
"If Ryu & the other male charcters were sexualised the same"
men and women are not the same and are attracted to different things
"more varied body types and not just steroid bodies"
i don't think you are going to find many people who find fat/short men more attractive than muscular/tall men
"Random nudity creeping into male outfits where it doesn't belong & outfits existing just to tease"
being shirtless is not nudity? how far would we need to go to put men on the same level as women wearing at the very least dancing outfits?
Last edited by o_O.Q - on 18 April 2019