Would you kill baby Hitler?

[OhNoYouDont]

fatslob-:O said:

OhNoYouDont said:

Because I'm addressing the claim you made that destiny is a real thing. That concept is contingent upon determinism, which QM clearly does not follow. It's not me who has to reconcile this, because I don't carry absurd baggage like destiny...

Point me to one physicist touting a deterministic model of QM to ground your ideas in reality rather than fantasy if you want me to take you seriously.

BTW did you even learn that probabilistic and deterministic are mutually exclusive yet? I posted that definition for you to read but you chopped it out of my reply to save yourself from additional embarrassment. Oops? 

Still beating the bush I see LOL ...

It's too bad you didn't realize that QM doesn't govern the extremely large world. It's physical laws only represents the microscopic scale. The fact that you fail to see the importance of general relativity in relation to the bigger scales means that you're obviously not a physicist ... 

General relativity IS deterministic so what are you going to do about the two sets of laws that clash with each other ? 

OhNoYouDont said:

It's not me who has an issue here. Your original argument was that racism is a worse outcome than a world war, which so far you've avoided with red herrings and taken absolutely no lengths to support. I will reiterate my initial reply: good luck convincing anybody of that.

Zero substance response once again ... 

OhNoYouDont said:

I've dismissed destiny with concrete science. Not my fault you haven't read a book since 2009. Under certain frameworks it's obvious to see why Hitler's death would offer superior moral value to the world. You have to invoke additional events to say things like "...but but but what if that causes aliens to come and destroy the planet?" Ridiculous at best.

Did your so called 'concrete' science fail to realize that QM doesn't work elsewhere aside from microscopic scales ?  

So much for being all knowing ... 

OhNoYouDont said:

Do you even understand what I said? Try actually making an effort.

How about we make this a little more thrilling if I'm boring you ?  

OhNoYouDont said:

I'm happy to compare resumes any time but just be aware that your posturing only makes you look like a delicate flower with a fragile ego. Please look up argumentum ad vericundiam and become intimately familiar with it before continuing this dialogue.

The arguments are convincing to those capable of rationality. Not so much to those who are more interested in puffing their chest out.

Sir, if anybody is suffering the DK effect (note: not syndrome) it is you. I have repeatedly demonstrated why the things you've said are wrong, whether scientifically or linguistically. You've yet to concede any of these concrete facts.

Come at me bro.

Resumes ? Hahaha, I'll see if I can try to entertain you ... 

1) Suppose that the dim(row(A))=m but the dim(col(A))=n and suppose that n>m. The rank(A)=m but why is the nul(transpose(A))=0 ?

2) Under what conditions is a path integral supposed to path independent ?

3) What are the two key objectives achieved by using the Jacobian matrix ? 

"Come at me bro." LMFAO, let's see if you can even answer any of these questions and I'll see how long you take as well ... (this'll hopefully get you to stop beating the bush so much and it'll show how much you truly know)

1. Failure to cite a single physicist supporting your delusion. WRONG

2. Zero support for your initial claim (again). WRONG

3. QM does apply to macro scale. Start reading...you're in dire need of it. WRONG

https://www.livescience.com/27137-uncertainty-principle-measured-macro-scale.html

http://www.yalescientific.org/2010/09/quantum-mechanics-on-the-macroscale/

https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/208754/do-quantum-mechanics-at-the-macro-scale-disprove-general-relativity-or-prove-som

4. Dodging (Again) WRONG

5. I don't see a resume. WRONG

It's quite clear by your bizarre response that you have no interest in the actual claims you made, were called out on your bullshit and are now running as fast as you can to the nearest red herring you can find.

Debate concluded-

Victor: Me

Loser: You