the-pi-guy said:
Someone on Era pointed out that Steam allows unlimited codes that a developer can sell without taking a cut for steam. Steam is far from perfect, but it is troubling that people are ignoring the actions of Epic, because "developers are getting a bigger cut". |
It's also rattling, as to how these people are also ignoring the fact that Discord holds the title of having the better cut for devs, but at the same time, GoG have had to drop their fair price policy. Valve are far from perfect, but they are making games, a store redesign and a headset+controllers. They are doing stuff and all Epic are doing is snatching up exclusives, timed at that, while being very, very slow with their storefront features, and we've yet to see worldwide "trickle down" prices for consumers (outside of the Metro deal, which was US based, not worldwide and no keys to be found anywhere else, same goes for Ubi's TD2).
It feels like Valve making a lower cut won't do anything. I guarantee you that the same uneducated folk will simply mutter "where's my HL3" next, followed by "why aren't the "crappy" games gone", Despite the fact that we already have tools to disable/ignore said "crappy games" (seriously, they've never heard of "one man's trash, is another man's treasure" before or something).
In fact, I want those same tools on the Switch eshop, because I'm getting fed up of having to manually sift through their store page. I'm actually having to look up the few games that look interested for the Switch on a website, rather than on the Switch itself, because their storefront doesn't contain the proper toolset for me to curate how I can view their storefront. People seem to throw this off as being "non important", but at the same time they will whine that said storefront is a mess and filled with "garbage" games, often citing the ened for curation, yet have already has it and it's called customer curation, with a hint of Valve trying to block the edgelord games (I say this, because the Rapeday dev was a complete edgelord, sending the wrong message at the worst time, instead of actually talking directly to Valve themselves, and even they couldn't catch onto the game until it was too late and the dev knew this and abused it).
I would absolutely like if Valve would lower their cut, but at the same time I am not wanting them to bleed for the sake of the devs, because I know that's not a sound business plan, but at the same time I'd like for them to offer devs a bit more assistance in getting them to make use of their own engine, the way Epic is clearly trying to rope everyone into using theirs (it's obvious Epic would love if everyone just used UE4, so I'd love Valve to counteract that with Source 2).
Mankind, in its arrogance and self-delusion, must believe they are the mirrors to God in both their image and their power. If something shatters that mirror, then it must be totally destroyed.







