By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
HylianSwordsman said:
DonFerrari said:

I know that we PSVR fans seems reallly fanatic/fanboys.

But really it have good value on being VR, and also working for non-VR as a very big screen (like using 300" at 6' distance).

I've been waiting for a really good experience to get me to dive into VR. This could definitely be that game for me. VR will get so much bigger once it has something people just HAVE to play. That and maybe be a bit cheaper, for example if it were built into a new system, like a PS5 or Switch 2 that just came with VR built in somehow.

Well Sony cut 100 from the price, and at 300 it is cheaper than a TV. But yes I understand that it is viewed different and that for an accessory it will be a harder sale.

I want Sony to improve PSVR experience on PS5 and make PS5 with it in mind. But since I don't know what type of built in you are saying I can't agree, because it could be a situation just like Kinect 2.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."