Guilty verdicts for key media stars tied to big mainstream political issues aren't trending as of late.
Kav apparently was supposed to be guilty and yet get's off scot-free.
Trump apparently was supposed to be guilty and yet get's off scot-free.
So it only makes sense that since Smollett apparently was supposed to be guilty, he get's off scot-free.
Hard to argue with that logic, no? Maybe the world really is flat... and upside down.
As in any kind pursuit for justice, the difference is in the quality of evidence.
Kav and Trump were assumed guilty with no solid evidence linking them to the crime. There was an investigation and a lot of the evidence (w/c were shown to the public) were inconclusive.
Smollet was guilty as sin with a paper trail and witnesses. This was open and shut but the prosecutor just decided to drop the charges. Which made this look corrupt as heck.
Big difference here.