| Kyros said: At the end of the warranty for one bought today it would be going on 6 years for it. this may be true now, but the RRoD is more or less fixed now anyway and I didn't have the impression that we discussed the RRoD as detrimental for buying NOW. The discussion started when you asked why RRoD was a problem at all and you said electronic devices do not hold for longer than 3 years anyway. And both statements are at best problematic and I argumented against them. So yes if you think the BC of the Xbox 720 will be good and you don't care about the hazzle of sending in your console should it fail you could disregard RRoD NOW. But that was not the question I was discussing. You should really try using the context of an arguement rather than a single stand alone line. Sorry but I do not like to copy/paste the whole post I am answering to. Worst thing you can do for thread readability. I try to copy the most important line I am answering so context is given. I do not think that I pulled this statement out of context though. If you think otherwise an example would be helpful. |
Ok I assumed you were just being difficult and intentionally changing the time frame of my statement. I'm sorry for that. I am just too used to only arguing with rabid fanboys on this site who would do something that dishonest. The quoting one line is fine by me so long as you use it as it was intended. I realize now I was not as clear as I intended. I meant from the time the warranty actually kicked in and onwards. Early on it was a huge issue as it was not covered outside the one year warranty and that was messed up. My statement is meant to be based on today forward.
I don't think that is the problem. Your sentence implies that you could skip breakfast once a month and pay for live for the entire year which would be $50 for breakfast. What you meant (I assume) is that skipping breakfast once a month pays for live for that month.
