Intrinsic said:
I don't think you understand how "being bought" works. And how is all that xbox and switch talk relevant? The real question here is if take-two are fixing or open t sell and if sony are willing to buy. Funy thing about things like these is that sony doesn't even have to use their "own money" if they really wanted to make a deal like this happen. Having said all that, I think this is one of those empty rumors that has no stock. And I just don't see sony fixing to spend around $10B on a studio(s). Unless its a pre-emptive move which would mean MS was abut to buy them. This is a deal that would have meant more for MS than it would for sony. |
If MS paid 2.5B for Minecraft no one can call Sony crazy for paying 10B on TakeTwo (but yes I don't think it is a soundy decision).
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."