Pemalite said:
HollyGamer said:
Ok then our reference card is a mistake, change Hawaii to Tahiti, because Tahiti was a high end GPU from 2013 and being surpassed by Polaris, there you have Polaris to Navi comparison possibility able to surpassed Vega 64 and radeon VII
https://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/AMD-RX-480-vs-AMD-R9-390/3634vs3481
I thought Hawaii was the one on 7970 or R 390 but it was tahiti.
|
Tahiti was the Radeon R9 280... But your comparison link is between Polaris and Hawaii? Like... You what, mate?
I feel like you are extremely confused, but despite that... Intend to keep arguing the point anyway.
HollyGamer said:
The video already prove it both of the argument, theory, math and all calculation.
|
No. It asserts those points and proves nothing.
A youtube video evidence does not make. - Otherwise I can simply claim the Earth is flat, lots of youtube videos about that!
HollyGamer said:
We are not discussing if it could be better or not, we are talking a big jump in AMD , of course we are not comparing to Nvidia, we are comparing to AMD previous GPU, so that gain is big.
|
False. We are discussing the entire big picture.
|
Ok so the point is, Polaris are on equal terms with High End GPu from previous year
Why the hell bring up flat earthers argument in here. Both are different matter.
False??? yup , you are the one who arefalse, you don't get the entire big picture on how and low iGPU Navi can be as powerful as mainstream GPU . Imagine how powerful dedicated mainstream desktop GPU is?
