Brexit

[Lafiel]

Random_Matt said:

Lafiel said:

eurosceptics lost the vote fair and square in 1975, why did they get a 2nd chance? their votes should be excluded from the 2016 ref

The past is irrelevant, in 2016 the electorate voted, it needs to be acted upon. How anyone can defend otherwise is full of it, immoral and probably should stop running their mouth.

How would you describe people that uphold the results of an advisory referendum in which the winning side has been proven and fined for overspending? A circumstance that would have automatically voided said referendum if it was binding and only doesn't, because it's "merely advisory".

immoral? full of it? running their mouths?