couchmonkey said:
Wait a minite! Microsoft absolutely subsidized XBox! They lost $1 billion per year on the original console and defended it as “market defence against Sony” to their investors. They lost $3 or $4 billion on 360 (can’t remember which) before they turned slightly profitable for the last half of it’s life (one billion was to pay off RROD problems, though). You could argue Xboxone is doing mediocre because ms stopped blowing all so much money on it. This will be very interesting. I am a cloud gaming skeptic, ad I would argue a console is a smart, but very difficult, choice to try to lever your streaming service into the market. I assume we will now see Microsoft get more aggressive about consoles again...it is going to be something else. I don’t expect major success for Google at a glance, but who knows where they could go. definitely do not mistake that controller design for final, and don’t mistake Googlebox for Ouya, this will be totally different. |
Not to forget that the start of this gen had plenty of Xbox fan defending MS would obliterate Sony with their infinity money, selling consoles for big loss and buying all exclusives.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







