By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Mar1217 said:
DonFerrari said:

Officially yes, but I'm pretty sure Sony have/will put money on it as well. The amount raised in Kickstarter doesn't seem like what would be needed if they were to go their full vision. But well even if Sony doesn't put a cent on it the advertisement itself is worth quite some money (well Sony also benefitted a lot from it).

And there is almost no full exclusive anyway besides the ones made by 1st party. And on that it is quite curious that on VGC every time some doesn't put a game on Nintendo platform we got a lot of complains but when they put only on Nintendo even without moneyhat we don't see as much complain (and probably would get quite some defenses on why it makes sense).

Are you willingly forgetting the discussions over SMT V Switch exclusivity ? Cuz I remember some lengthy discussions about that one.

Nope. If there were a thread I either didn't participate or don't remember it. Still, would you agree that we get more attacks on games not going to Switch than to other systems? Same as we get more defense for game going only to Switch and not on others?

And that basically because userbase of Nintendo is a little bigger and also PS fanbase already receive a lot of games so less care given to the few games that don't go there without any attacks to the devs being dumb or hating the platform?

You could have used the case of Bayonetta, that is one that usually had complains from selected users from Xbox and PS.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."