Would you kill baby Hitler?

[OhNoYouDont]

fatslob-:O said:
I cannot in my own conscience have the desire to change what is supposed to be destiny ...

If villains like Hitler are destined to commit acts of atrocity then so be it and likewise if heroes like Abraham Lincoln are destined to fall then they must meet their end. There shall be no assisting or hindering of other people's past from me because I believe there exists a reason for everything that happens with this intricate reality. Had WWII not happened, my life may have ended up taking a turn for the worst ...

For all the bad things that has happened with Hitler starting WWII, there were also positive results that came from it too such as an independent Jewish state, decolonization and many more technological advances ...

This is a really poor argument to anyone who doesn't embrace the idea of destiny which is, at best, silly. But it gets worse for you because you say that even if you had the power to prevent the slaughter of millions of your fellow human beings, you would not act; which is cowardly. Perhaps even immorally so to those who believe in such things.

Would I kill baby Hilter? Absolutely, without hesitation. 

Nobody else seems to even confront the actual question. The question isn't "Would you kill a baby that may or may not cause harm to others?" which several guilt-assuaging denizens have perverted it to be. It's "Would you kill baby Hitler?" and I think it's perfectly obvious what that question entails.