SpokenTruth said:
We've been trying this whole thread. But you simply don't understand racism. You have an exceptionally simplistic idea of what it means. Then when you go to apply that exceptionally simplistic idea of racism it falls apart. You don't know how to separate your version of racism from a stereotype, trope or cliche. Which is rather ironic when you think about it. You can't take the race or sex out of a trope if the race and sex are part of the trope. Can black people be tired of the angry black woman trope/cliche/stereotype? Of course they can. Does that make it racist against black people or sexist against women? No. Or racist and sexist against black women? No. But you are trying to say it is and it's ridiculous.
I know you are capable of understanding this which is why it's so frustrating. Because it feels like you are intentionally trying to use liberal/Democratic movements back at them without grasping what it all really means. |
my point is simple. whether it's racism or not , the skin colour should not be a factor. ok so he is sickofwhite male scruffy and buff biker gang leaders? but if this exact same character was black would it be any more interesting? I'd argue no because the colour of his skin is not something i judge characters by.
