MrWayne said:
What do you mean? I can play Chess on my PC, so why do I have to make a distinction? https://store.steampowered.com/app/518060/Chess_Ultra/ You didn't explain why games are different than cinema, music and literature in regards to technological advancement. |
Do you really need me to explain to you how much constraints changed from Atari to PS4 and how much more games could do due to this technological advancements? I don't much a book content improved from Old Greeks to today. So on one hand we have gigantic changes on the content and envelope on a 30-40 years window against almost nill change on 3000 years... yes both are certainly either totally independent of technology or evolved continuously.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







