By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Pemalite said:
forevercloud3000 said:

Gamepass has stable downloads to play on XB1 but this raises the question, how will this service work for next gen and their plan to touch other devices? STREAMING is the only answer to that, as you cannot play native games coded for other consoles. So PSNow is actually ahead of the curve for what is supposed to be MS's master plan with the service

For starters... There is this thing called "Virtualization", "Binary Translation", "Abstraction" and "Emulation" that allows for Microsofts current backwards compatibility efforts to be a drop in on next-gen hardware/other devices with minimal effort.

forevercloud3000 said:

PSNow earned around $143 Million out of the total $273 Million made in Game Subscriptions in 2018w has.

Of course that's going to happen. Sony has a larger piece of the console market than Microsoft.

Azzanation said:
PSNow and GamePass are different services at the current rate. PSNow is a Streaming service on multiple devices while GamePass is exclusive to the Xbox One from what I know of. However the big difference with the two is that PSNow is a standard Streaming services while GamePass will most likely become a Streaming service that connects to XCloud that would (Should) offer premium Streaming abilities.

You can stream Gamepass titles to PC via the Windows 10 Xbox app I think... You still need a console to do the heavy lifting/rendering though.

We had users swear XBL Gold have more subscribers than PS+ and that they make more money out of it than Sony and all the 2:1 HW Sony have this gen is irrelevant because of it.

zorg1000 said:
Soundwave said:

Well I mean you just said it right ... they just recently started offering PS4 content ... that's ridiculous, lol. There was no technical reason to not offer that years ago. 

Youre missing my point. You're right that they could/should have added it earlier but if they didnt care and didnt want it to succeed than why are  they trying to add value to it? If they didnt care than they would have just left PS4 games off of it forever.

They also just announced last month that the service is coming later this year to Spain, Italy, Portugal, Norway, Denmark, Finland & Sweden. Kind of weird to add regions to the service you dont want to succeed.

Sony doesn't care, they paid several hundred million dollars on Gaikai just for the giggles.

Soundwave said:
forevercloud3000 said:

My point is GamePass purpose is to eventually lead into Streaming(to be on more than just Xbox) which PSNow has beaten it to the punch in that regard. Not to mention, Sony added the ability to directly download a large portion of the games just like XB1 so that is a moot point.

The quality disparity could def be a big factor...but I question how much.  As Sony just said in their Keynote they had a week ago, average consumers do not look at games in pixel ratios. Sure, they latch on to the buzz words but mostly they just want to be able to have the experience for the cheapest and most unhindered.  Most of the kids playing on PC are using dated monitors and hardware by Elite Pro standards. Phones and Switch also are not sporting 4K visuals and why would they need to? People will go with what has more of perceived value, usually quality vs Price. 

PSNow can be the inferior performing streaming service....but if it is the service with more games and more exclusives on the devices that people predominantly own......then it can maintain it's lead. Not to mention no matter what MS does, their service will not have Sony exclusives which are likely a service seller and decider.

Sony is going to get trampled, if not by MS, by Amazon or Google. 

They are small potatoes compared to those companies and they have a major conflict of interest with streaming becoming too good. They can't make the service too good because then the problem is a lot of people will start to ask why they even need a PS5. MS doesn't really care if you buy a physical XBox or not. Obviously Google or Amazon don't care. That's a huge difference. 

For a 5 year old service PSNow is very poor. How is it they don't even have support for smartphones or tablets? What decade are they in? 2002? 

Yes they will, as MS have tramped PS4 this gen as promised because of their infinity money.

lansingone said:
Pretty sure the only reason MS is doing day one games on game pass is because with their current cycle of games, they make more money. If they increase their yearly output, they'd start losing money. It's currently 120 per year, so if they release 2 AAA games in one year, and the average subscriber played them both, they would probably lose money right there because if they have 3rd party games on it, they'll need to pay those publishers something. I wouldn't be surprised if they dropped the day one rule for next gen.

They also do it because they are on the losing end so needs positives. Sony offered free MP on PS3 (with those codes for second hand tried and failed) because X360 was fierce competitor, but put it behind PS+ this gen.

Conina said:
forevercloud3000 said:

The Playstation PSNow page advertises 275+ games available for download to the console. I am not sure which are the ones available.

So you are just throw around some numbers all the time and don't even know what you are talking about? That's hilarious!

To help you a bit... it ain't THAT complicated to find out which games are downloadable and which are streaming only: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_PlayStation_Now_games

You were also talking about "an exclusive library in the hundreds". The PS Now library has hundreds of games, but only a small fraction of them is exclusive.

I believe he wanted to say exclusives to the service compared to GamerPass.

The_Liquid_Laser said:
LudicrousSpeed said:

How have music or movies suffered at all? Studios still spend tons of money on movies. Artists still release a lot of music. Seems a stretch to think it will affect games in any negative way. 

Movies are mostly doing fine.  Music is doing terrible though.  If you look at the financials of the Music Industry compared to today, then you'll see they really are in the toilet now.

But the Movie Industry is mostly fine.  The devil is in the details as they say.  Streaming isn't necessarily a bane or a boon.  It's all in how it is executed.

Movies/Series cost less to make, are faster to produce and have a much bigger audience, so that is one big reason for streaming on it being possibly less damaging than in gaming.

 

@Thread with Sony allowing download on PSNow for games that run native on the system of PS4, plus rumor of full BC on PS5, PSNow may offer just about all streaming and download from all digitalized library of PS on it, with streaming only option to be on other devices.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."