Intrinsic said:
It actually makes a lot of sense. I mean we have $2000 gaming laptops that ship with 1080p screens. We also have the cheaper 1080p consoles outselling the 4k versions by like 4:1. The simple truth is that even though 4K is increasingly popular a majority of the console user base simply wouldn't care. They would buy the 1080p version over the 4k one. |
I know it makes sense... However I "personally" don't see the point of a 1080P SKU.
Because even if you have 1080P screens (I don't), there is still substantial increases in visuals by downsampling from 4k.
| Intrinsic said: Not really. As lng as the CPU is the same, it has a decent amunt of RAM (12GB is decent) and the gal is to run the ames at 1080p.... a 4TF GPU is more than enugh for that. And for the peple that dont mind playin their games at 1080p they will be just fine with it. |
People are far to hung up on the amount of flops anyway.
A 4 Teraflop Navi is going to be faster than a 4 Teraflop Polaris GPU.
Efficiency goes up irrespective of the single precision computational capabilities of a processor.
--::{PC Gaming Master Race}::--
