Farsala said:
Not the only one, the S model was a much bigger factor than Kinect imo. Obviously, both were still factors in the high sales.
I already went over this with you. http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8951179 Specifically; 2009 250gb- US$399.99, C$399.99, £249.99, €329.99, A$599.00 S Model 250 gb- US$299.99, C$299.99, £199.99, €249.99,A$449.00, NZ$499.00" If that's not a pricecut then I guess I don't know economics. |
I dont get how anybody can think a prettier sku increased sales more than the thing that set a record for fastest selling consumer electronics device and was aimed at a completely different demographic than was already on the system.
I know we went over it and you're wrong. The prices remained the same, they switched the amount of storage in each sku adding value, that is not a price cut.
Regular model
512mb-$199 (Sept 2008)
120gb-$299 (Aug 2009)
S model
4gb-$199 (June 2010)
250gb-$299 (June 2010)
If the price is the same than it's not a price cut, its adding value.
When the herd loses its way, the shepard must kill the bull that leads them astray.