Crackdown 3 Review Thread - MC: 60 OC: 62

[DonFerrari]

Mr Puggsly said:

DonFerrari said:

It is a valid opinion that it is the best game to reach 60 or below, I would really have to look all other games that got lower and would take a good time. And since it seems that only a fraction of CD3 thinks it I don't think there is much point on this. The critics aren't collectively lying or being obtusely harsh. The game may just not reach consensus of good even if on fanbase it is considered quite good.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rWQ84OLlQeI

Watched this from DF and not impressive, the guys analyzing aren't impressed as well, putting it below Red Guerilla.

Textures are very plain, objects seems like type of polygon from PS1-PS2 on how simplistic and pointy they are.

You saw the wrong video. I said the campaign video.

By the way I didn't say it has amazing graphics, I said its polished. It has has a high resolution for X1, fairly stable performance, the assets arent highly detailed but look good, tons of effects, its just a nice looking game. People usually expect less from UE4.

Kinda makes me think of Nintendo games. Its simplistic, cartoonish and great use of color. It the not something you boast about but I like the visuals.

Isn't multiplayer also part of the game? Should the reviewer pretend it isn't part of the game?

I'll watch the single player tomorrow.

Not even polished, and wouldn't even say good graphics. Who expect less than Crackdown 3 from UE4?

Sorry man, but Zelda, Mario 3D, and couple other games on Switch look better than CD3 for a fraction of the power, and that is on higher framerate, more stable and probably taking less time.