Crackdown 3 Review Thread - MC: 60 OC: 62

[DonFerrari]

LudicrousSpeed said:

DonFerrari said:

Please elucidate to me how "partnering" is 1st party and isn't buying third party content (or did you want to say timed exclusive?).

And then they had a lot of games to announce but few to release on that and coming years?

Read your own links and you wouldn't need me to clear up anything for you.

You're shifting goal posts. You posted a link about E3 2015 trying to say they didn't actually show a lot of games and when you got corrected on that you're now trying to talk about releases. Idk, I think outside of Fable, they released all of those games. Either way it was a lame attempt at substantiating your claim that the Xboss is a liar.

Nope, you are just making things as you go. I put the links to prove that Phil Spencer have been promising better 1st party for several years while you claim he never did so.

Mr Puggsly said:

DonFerrari said: 

Well that is collective of people experience, what you see can be totally different though.

You only claim it is fair because it defends your point, that is the issue.

Ok you considering it mid tier, even if from what we see from MS along the years put it as high tier to them. But that really isn't much of a worthy discussion.

Sincerely I find it very hard to believe that the best implementation of UE4 would be on the lower end of the scores (we do know that very few game score lower than 60), and even without playing it I also wouldn't see 60 as an appropriate score for a game that works well and deliver what it's supposed to do.

If the gaming score really used full spectrum from 0 to 10, instead of 5 to 10, then perhaps 60 would be a fitting score, like a little above average. But on our use of the scale 7-7.5 seems more likely to be right.

In general I think the HLTB is fairly accurate when it comes to completing campaigns, but the numbers for completing everything is much more random especially in an open world game.

ok

Again, watch the video. If you can spend a bunch of time talking about Crackdown 3 then maybe you can find the time for that video. I'm thinking your concern is it doesn't fit your narrative.

Nope, my concern is you only accepting a single source among several reviews as the right one, because most of the others are bad. Just look back on the thread and you'll see me defending the review that gave it a 90.

Straw man, I didn't claim it was the best implementation of UE4. You're making assumptions because of the 60 score without actually knowing much.

The 1-10 review scale is broken in my opinion because 1-5 is varying levels of crap. While 6 is often the score for bad game with redeeming qualities. So 60/100 seems odd for a game that's actually fun, polished and works well. This is why fans are ignoring the reviews for this game.

1-5 is varying level that barely anyone scores on that. It's odd because you like the game and disagree with the critics.