Robert_Downey_Jr. said:
Is an SSD really a possibility? Seems like something that most consumers wouldn't care as much about or give that much better performance considering the cost involved? Considering how much more the box would cost to produce they would really be taking a hit either in the performance of more important parts for graphics or be taking a hit in price. Over millions of units it saves a lot while really not sacrificing much performance. Also isn't that the same amount of RAM as the XboxX (better type I know) while this machine is supposed to last through 2026 at least? I know it's $100 cheaper than the X currently but that still would be short sighted to me. I recall Sony doubling the RAM in PS4 shortly before they announced it from 4 to 8 and that was a huge increase over PS3 |
Yes Sony doubled from 4 to 8, with space for game going from 3 to 5.5 ... I really would have prefered they had 7Gb and kept OS to 1Gb.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."