| Azuren said: So we've got our first rage-bait article from VideoGamer, who gave this game a 40 in what I would assume is a bid to get rage clicks. This drops the score from 88 to 86. |
And the most ridiculous part is that when you read the review it seems more like a 7 than a 4.
Also his complain are obnoxious like he say the game challenge your eyes (with prettyness) but don't challenge the mind with they not having a deep story or darker themes (while a couple paragraphs before he complained he couldn't understand the story). Also he completely ignores that although the disney and pixar chars are quite cheerful the background of the story is quite dark and full of loses.
| OTBWY said: I've been playing it for a bit. I like it so far but I have issues. Right now I would give it about a 7.5 for certain reasons. 1: Performance issues. I am getting framerate dips and it is noticeable. Second, this games story is not for those who only went by the regular numbers. 1 and 2. Third, the combat is getting a bit stale for me. Maybe it's me but I don't remember it feeling this outdated. Everything else is fine. Oh and this is probably just me but the camera disorients me sometimes. |
2 - Shouldn't be an issue, if you can't understand the story because you played only KH3 or only numbered entries it isn't a fault of the game. Even more when they offer you those 5 or 6 mini movies to tell key points of the story.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







