CGI-Quality said:
SecondWar said: I think its more based on economics. If Metro Exodus sells poorly on the PC then he believes that it would mean Metro 4 (or whatever) is then less likely to have a PC version. The lost profit arguement you use only works if the game actually turns a profit on the platform. If a potential boycott causes a loss then that's what they have to go off.
Honestly, I really don't get the fuss about Metro not being on Steam. Epic will be creamed if they didn't invest in their store when they're up against a competitor as dominant as Steam. Microsoft did the same in the early days of the 360 to try to syphon off some of the PlayStation base. |
As has been stated, the issue isn't simply that Metro won't be on Steam for a year. It is that said deal happened just under three weeks from release. It is a bad precedent to set and it's good that people spoke up about it.
Regarding this latest statement, it is an easy way to lose a fanbase.
|
Exactly. If this had been announced months ago, a year would be preferable, then the outrage wouldn't be so heated. But, we are less than a month from release and they drop this bomb on people. Really, they should have let this release as is, but have a slight discount ($5-$10) on Epic Store to appeal to people. If they release another game, then they can announce this along with the game, or shortly after.