outlawauron said:
The point is pretty obvious. It's to show the change in the industry, why companies are acting the way they are (ie. why Nintendo is making you pay for online pay), and how truly massive the digital marketplace has become. All of that information is very important to investors because it shows how well they're doing in one of the very few growing game markets. |
If the original poster framed it in a way such as "PSN showed 50% YOY growth" or something like that then yes, it's good info to know. But comparing it to Nintendo's revenue is misleading - it's apples to oranges.
Further more, the growth could have come from heavily discounting lots of games which would have a smaller margin, meaning that the profit could be way less than 50% YOY increase... we simply don't know.
Also Nintendo's profit could be approximately the same as Sony gaming overall - in which case who's to say which model is better? To me, running a business at a higher profit to revenue ratio (profit margin) seems preferable to me, though I'll admit that it's likely more complicated than that.
Anyway, I don't contest PSN is doing awesome - it's the flawed comparison that I have a problem with.