Pemalite said:
Chazore said:
32 would have been nice, but given how things run for me at DSR 4k, I'd rather the nice looking, neatly cable managed 1440p monitor.
I'd say gimme a ring when we get 4k assets displayed at 4k for everything, while running above 60fps. Until then, 4k just isn't worth much of anything in my eyes. 1440p has been my current sweet spot over the past 2 yrs now.
|
1440P is the sweet spot.
It's a step up over 1080P... But it's hardware demands isn't as high as 4k.
Just 1440P, 144hz, 27" has been done to death at this point... The cable management is really what sets this monitor apart... But is that really worth the Razer premium?
|
That and the monitor itself is different in design. No the size of the monitor is the same, but it's stand and outside shape are different.
The cost itself afak wasn't asking for £700-1000, which some crazy monitor makers can ask for. My Acer Predator 165hz one wasn't cheap as chips for one.
Mankind, in its arrogance and self-delusion, must believe they are the mirrors to God in both their image and their power. If something shatters that mirror, then it must be totally destroyed.
