By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Pemalite on 09 January 2019
Edit Thread
Chazore said:
Pemalite said:

1440P, 144hz, 27" is pretty uninteresting to be honest.
If it was 4k or 32" then I might be interested.

I would also prefer 120hz as it's a multiple of 30hz which is what a ton of media operates at.

It does have style though, going to give it that.

32 would have been nice, but given how things run for me at DSR 4k, I'd rather the nice looking, neatly cable managed 1440p monitor.

I'd say gimme a ring when we get 4k assets displayed at 4k for everything, while running above 60fps. Until then, 4k just isn't worth much of anything in my eyes. 1440p  has been my current sweet spot over the past 2 yrs now.

1440P is the sweet spot.
It's a step up over 1080P... But it's hardware demands isn't as high as 4k.

Just 1440P, 144hz, 27" has been done to death at this point... The cable management is really what sets this monitor apart... But is that really worth the Razer premium?




www.youtube.com/@Pemalite