By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Pemalite said:
JEMC said:
Model Cores/Threads  Base Clock Turbo Clock TDP
Ryzen 9 3800X 16C/32T 3.9 GHz 4.7 GHz 125W
Ryzen 7 3700X 12C/24T 4.2 GHz 5.0 GHz 105W
Ryzen 7 3700 12C/24T 3.8 GHz 4.6 GHz 95W
Ryzen 5 3600X 8C/16T 4.0 GHz 4.8 GHz 95W
Ryzen 5 3600 8C/16T 3.6 GHz 4.4 GHz 65W
Ryzen 3 3300X 6C/12T 3.5 GHz 4.3 GHz 65W
Ryzen 3 3300 6C/12T 3.2 GHz 4.0 GHz 50W

 

To me, the most interesting one is the 3700X, with 12 cores/24 threads and 4.2GHz base clock and 5GHz boost. That would be a beast.

But remember that this is just a rumor because, even though AMD will (allegedly) announce them at CES in 6 days, there won't be press days for briefings, meaning that the launch is still a bit away, which would raise questions such as why does this retailer know so much about them.

Clockrates fall in line with the rough increases expected from TSMC's 7nm clock gains as well. (Of course, salt still required.)

If those clocks are true and if AMD manages to improve their gaming performance, Intel could be in very big trouble.

After all, the 9900K works in a range of 3.6 to 5.0GHz, making it only a slight faster in single threaded programs, but slower than it in multi-threaded ones, than the (probably) much cheaper 3600X. And then there's the 3700X, faster and with more cores.

But yes, it's better to wait until we know the final specs and then the reviews come in to gauge how these new processors compare with Intel's latest.



Please excuse my bad English.

Former gaming PC: i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070

Current gaming PC: R5-7600, 32GB RAM 6000MT/s (CL30) and a RX 9060XT 16GB

Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet    Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.