Pemalite said:
Clockrates fall in line with the rough increases expected from TSMC's 7nm clock gains as well. (Of course, salt still required.) |
If those clocks are true and if AMD manages to improve their gaming performance, Intel could be in very big trouble.
After all, the 9900K works in a range of 3.6 to 5.0GHz, making it only a slight faster in single threaded programs, but slower than it in multi-threaded ones, than the (probably) much cheaper 3600X. And then there's the 3700X, faster and with more cores.
But yes, it's better to wait until we know the final specs and then the reviews come in to gauge how these new processors compare with Intel's latest.
Please excuse my bad English.
Former gaming PC: i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070
Current gaming PC: R5-7600, 32GB RAM 6000MT/s (CL30) and a RX 9060XT 16GB
Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.







