| Pemalite said: The issue with DLC or any DLC for that matter... Is that it's not a regulated concept by any governing bodies. - And because of such... It's open for companies to abuse. And we have consistently seen that abuse time and time again over the years. It hasn't done the consumer any favors, it hasn't done the industry any favors. - Publishers claim "increased development costs" - Yet their profits are constantly on the increase, outstripping any such increase in development costs... The Publishers are just trying to make every single cent they can at the expense of all others, even development studios. Heck, we have seen some high-profile studios close down in recent years. Just stop buying DLC and spending money on useless Microtransactions, go back to enjoying a game for what it is. |
No. Some of the best content I've played has been DLC, content that would not have existed otherwise. If I really like a game then I want more of it. Sometimes the DLC is better than the actual game or improves the base game greatly. If you don't want that, that's fine, don't buy it, but you don't get to take that away from anyone else. The logical approach would be to buy content based on quality and value, no matter if it's DLC or the original game itself.
KManX89 said:
With the way things are going, I can definitely see it getting to that point sadly. The corporate sheep's response: "It's optional! I don't care because I'm not poor! Companies need to make money! Entitlement!" |
Still trying to change the argument to something else because you failed at this one.
See, an adult is able to say, "this is okay, but that is not okay." Your premise that someone who is fine with situation A will automatically support situation B is complete bullshit. It's a childish, idiotic argument. While you kick and scream throw a tantrum over every little thing, like some kind of bleeding heart SJW, other people can rationally analyse each situation on an individual basis.
