By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
omarct said:
DonFerrari said:

Seems like you haven't read much on his posts. He is totally admitting he is being elitist on Fire Emblem and accepting that it contradicts what he think about Souls.

Well you cant have your cake and eat it too. You can't say well some specific games that I like shouldn't have easier modes but those games I do not like or care for, should have easier modes. Again this goes back to the reasoning behind this whole argument being extremely selfish and self centered, "I want to play this game so it should be changed to accommodate my needs".

He isn't asking for having it both ways. He is just accepting that he is wrong for felling different for a particular game he fells very attached to it and how it is played. Which is similar to how some few on DS, but the guy accepts he is wrong.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."