o_O.Q said:
SuaveSocialist said: Man agrees to abide by terms of service. Proceeds to indulge his persecution complex when he is predictably punished for violating the terms of service he’d previously agreed to uphold. Some people think the rules just don’t apply to them, choosing to cry about an imaginary biased Dark Web instead of pulling thelves up by the bootstraps and taking personal responsibility. |
i've not seen anyone posting proof that he broke the TOS
|
You must not have seen the OP, then. Fourth paragraph in Harris states that “the company maintains that each was in violation of its terms of service” (and you are certainly free to review those terms at your own leisure). The reason for the Gavel’s fall is on record.