By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Wyrdness on 20 December 2018
Edit Thread
SpokenTruth said:
Wyrdness said:

To you maybe ironically you can't even use your "Industry argument" here.

SNES was replaced in 96 which means for two years it competed with the PS1 and Saturn meaning two gens were active at the same time which is something you can't argue here, the fact you don't know were to class DC highlights how wonky your logic is here.

And for the first 4 years the SNES competed against the rest of the 4th generation.  Why are you only looking at the last 2 years?

Further, I never said 2 generations cannot be active at the same time.  You're welcome to track down a quote of me saying such.

And for the last time, it's not my logic.  It's the definition the industry has been using for decades.  Bitch to them and everybody that has worked in it now and since the beginning when they established such delineations.  I don't get why you are so angered by this.  You told me to "get over it" in the other thread as though you alone dictate how the industry should classify generations. I'm just telling you how they've done it since the start.  Take it up with them.

Here I'll break it down for you, 0d0 said the have been times with a few platforms from the same gen and I pointed out the are also times when platforms from different gens can be active at the same time and that's an example.

Why are you even replying then as that's the point? You're trying to debunk the point which wasn't even replying to you either, in other words you have no real point in replying.

Funny how the industry classes Megadrive as the same gen as SNES which contradicts your initial reply, as someone pointed out in another thread the industry doesn't use a definition like you claim forum goers do, you're the one constantly bringing up this logic so as such you become a vassal for it as well as where you got it from.