Intrinsic said:
First off that was from about 2 years ago. I simply couldn't remember exactly what I said. I did know however and said in this thread already that I had already previously revised my original prediction. And whats funny is that my revision was from the very same thread that he dredged up my previous post. I am guessing it wouldnt have had a similar effect to ridicule me if he had also quoted the post I made from that same thread where I took it up to around 60M. Basically in the first and biggest NS pre release prediction thread. I made a prediction of 35M -40M which I then changed to 55M - 60M. And yet only get quoted on my 35M - 40M initial prediction two years later to use as a means to question my credibility. You even said I shouldn't be taken seriously. I bet you couldn't remember that you were the very person that got into a big debate back then about my numbers changing. |
And that's fine that you forgot but the poster didnt ridicule you with that quote, all he did was show you that your statement wasnt correct.
Well honestly your Switch predictions shouldn't be taken seriously as you have upped them 3 times now. From 35-40 to 55-60 to 70-80 and now to 85+.
I do remember the argument in that thread and like I said in my last post, it was never an argument about your numbers changing, it was about a contradicting statement you made.
When the herd loses its way, the shepard must kill the bull that leads them astray.