By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
shikamaru317 said:
Random_Matt said:
So console A is being held back from console B, brilliant idea.

Actually, Lockhart shouldn't hold back Anaconda at all. The rumored specs for Lockhart are high enough that the only downgrade should be resolution, Lockhart should play next gen games at 1080p that Anaconda plays at 4K with no other graphical downgrades. It therefore shouldn't hold back graphics for exclusives or multiplats next-gen. 

The lower denominator (even more when the best selling one) will always hold up some. If 90% of the market chose the lower one, what incentives are for most devs on putting all effort on the higher option?

It's not out of the blue that several PC gamers blame consoles for holding they back. Consoles sell much more SW so they are taken more in account.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."