Pemalite said:
HollyGamer said:
I am not talking about the flops, i am talking about comparison to make it easy to compare so i wouldn't have to explain between console generation. To be called premium like Xbox One X , Anaconda should have the power 5 to 6 times Lockhart.
|
Again. Performance has no correspondence to a console generation or if it's a premium device.
Apple markets it's devices as premium... And yet is often beaten by Android alternatives in many aspects relating to it's hardware. (I.E. Ram and Displays)
What makes a premium device is a device that hasn't had corners cut... What makes the Xbox One X a premium device isn't it's performance (As it's only PC mid-range/low-end anyway) but because of the overall design, the fact it's using Vapor-Chamber cooling, it has a slim profile, it runs fairly quietly and has a stupidly efficient power supply/delivery system.
Personally, I don't believe AMD has any next-gen level of GPU hardware on the market yet, I will wait and see what Navi and Next Gen brings though.
|
Ok , i am agree and disagree about performance , because we are here in this thread are not talking about definition of generation. what i m trying to say is Anaconda cannot be compared to Xbox One X as premium device because Xbox One X is 4 to 5 times in terms of graphic capability compared to Xbox One. And that would be impossible to pull it out on the same year as the normal one (lockhart). The price 500 USD is another prove it wont be as premium or advance of leap in graphic capability. And please stop bringing more discussion that out of topic. Because it will complicated the discussion.
