danasider said:
Yes, but all those changes were done by the content creators (directors, writers, etc), not by the consumer. Fans bitch and moan in every medium, and that's expected. It's good even. But it's not a reactive thing in video games. Gamers believe devs should make their game liked by every type of gamer, even at the expense of ruining the dev's vision, and that's just not possible. Like we're ordering custom creations when games can't please every type of consumer. |
It isn't requesting that it please EVERY type of consumer. It is one implementation that would please a lot of customers though. You are being disingenuous because your argument didn't achieve the point you wanted.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
