Jumpin said:
I didn't say anything about all other differences. Where are you getting this from?
Also, what you said is fairly straightforward:
I've looked up the definition in American dictionaries and encyclopedias, and unsurprisingly it's the same as the rest of the world. This is what you wrote, this is what you're failing to support without moving the goalposts to some weird definition you just made up in order to avoid admitting you were lying. |
Just going to point out that his consistent inability to provide evidence for his position (be it through logic or a reputable, verifiable source) indicates that he maintains his position on faith, not evidence. According to his own “definition” of “religious nonsense”, that makes him guilty of peddling religious nonsense himself throughout this thread (and others).
That should be an indicator of how unhelpful his “definition” actually is, as it spectacularly fails to distinguish religious nonsense from any other nonsense, to such an extent that he broadcasts his own wholehearted commitment to what he supposedly disapproves of. I’m not sure what you hope or expect to gain in your conversation, as it is clear that he neither understands what words mean or how to think critically.
You may find Cleverbot more worthy of your time and effort. Seriously. Cleverbot is better at staying on topic, has a better understanding of what words mean, and you can be 100% certain that it isn’t actively trolling you at any given point.








