By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DonFerrari on 28 November 2018
Edit Thread
Mr Puggsly said:
DonFerrari said:
I Would preffer Super Mario All-Star. I'm pretty sure I won't bother about Halo MCC 20 years after release while I still care about SM AS

Still easy to find people playing Halo 1 and its not that far from 20 years.

If MCC ever gets a PC release, it could be popular if handled properly.

Well I didn't say no one will care about MCC in 20 years, I said I wouldn't. So that is why for me Super Mario All-Star is better/more relevant collection. I'm perfectly fine with you thinking Halo MCC is better though.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."