RolStoppable said:
Looks like you missed the point about supply constraints and Black Friday deals. Nintendo had no reason to offer any deals last year because the stock they did have was going to sell without special offers, therefore any sorts of deals would have only impacted their bottom line, but not raised unit sales. In theory, a $299 bundle with Mario Kart would have led to higher sales than ~800k in November 2017; but in praxis, Nintendo did not have the supply to get higher holiday sales than they did. Regarding your bets, you won some because your Nintendo equivalents reacted to your hyperbole with hyperbole and set way higher goals than they needed to prove you wrong and it backfired on them. The 5.2m bet is different, because it granted you only some wiggle room - you said Switch would be flat year over year at best (4.88m). |
Would you like to make some on the hyperboles of Sony projecting 16M and Nintendo 20M for FY18?
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."