Miyamotoo said:
I get what are you saying, but when you comparing different price points you also need to take in account things that I mentioned. Pro is not crucial, crucial was PS4 beating XB1 in first year, after that evrething was much more easier for PS4. Talking about price point, my point it that even PS4 has still offical price point of $300 you could almost regularly bought it for $200-250 like part of plenty and very often deals. Worth mentione that last and this year are strongest years for PS4. 100m is very achievable for Switch, 80m is bare minimum that Switch will do, I mean Switch will be at around 37m after first two years on market. Actually X1X is main reason XB1 is selling so much better in US this year compared to previous years. Well yeah, and thats why Switch will keep selling despite PS5/XB2 launch. |
Sure we have to take everything in consideration. But even so when you start 100 cheaper and basically match the other sales curve you start having less pricecuts available to accelerate, when you have your big hitters come earlier as well.
So it will be a lot harder for Switch to reach a point of year 5 or 6 having sales on level of PS4. As some said, that will deeply depend on they being able to launch SKUs of HH only for like 99-149 and table only for 199 or something of the type on the near future.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."