By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Jumpin said:
o_O.Q said:

lol are you now trying to argue that feminism and the current democratic party aren't linked significantly?

Clearly, that's not what I'm arguing.

Perhaps your reading comprehension ability is limited, so I'll write it out more simply:

1. Your claim: You see more religious bullshit policies from the Democratic Party than the Republicans.
2. Your evidence: a bunch of random girls marching in feminist parades.
3. What religious bullshit policies from the democratic party caused these random girls to want to go to a parade?

this was my claim

"if you ask me i've been seeing more religious nonsense from the democrats recently"

what are you talking about?

but yes the rhetoric eventually evolves into policy, which is why for example it is now law to refer to someone with the pronouns of their stated identity

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2016/05/17/you-can-be-fined-for-not-calling-people-ze-or-hir-if-thats-the-pronoun-they-demand-that-you-use/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.fbced15150d1

because of policies like these we are currently in a position where they are if i remember correctly 30 something recognised genders and that list is increasing all the time since anyone can just choose to come up with something new

you don't think that is bullshit and a cause for concern? do i need to get into other policies?

 

"What religious bullshit policies from the democratic party"

as i said here

"if you ask me i've been seeing more religious nonsense from the democrats recently""

in other words its nonsensical rhetoric that is motivating people and eventually becoming policy

is that hard to understand?

or does it not matter if this comes from the tribe you personally identify with?