| Dulfite said: So remastered, not remade C&C? Either way, the old system was far better than the new one. No more of that offense/support/defense nonsense. Their best games were RE2, Yuri's Revenge, Generals, and Tiberian Sun. |
If you've read the article and the quoted announcement, it looks like that, a remaster. But if you read the whole announcement, it ends with this paragraph:
"I’m looking forward to re-engaging with the fans of the series as we bring the Command & Conquer franchise back to its roots of “easy to play, difficult to master”. We’re eager to provide an experience that takes advantage of enhanced connectivity, graphics features, and other technology improvements that weren’t around back in 1995. As we begin to craft the plan that will kick off the development phase of the project I’m eager to hear what else fans are looking for. If you could turn back the clock, what would you have wanted in the original C&C games? How true to a remaster should we adhere do? What modern improvements can be added without deviating from the core game? Balance changes? We will be starting development soon, so now is the time to let your voice be heard."
From that we take two things:
- The development still hasn't begun, so the games won't be out anytime soon.
- If they're thinking about adding new, modern, elements to the gameplay, it will likely be a remake rather than a remaster, or at least a mix of both.
Please excuse my bad English.
Currently gaming on a PC with an i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070
Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.
